Evaluation of Bone Healing Following Immediate and Delayed Dental Implant Placement
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of bone healing following immediate and delayed dental implant placement.
AIM The purpose of this study was to compare bone healing and coronal bone remodeling following both immediate and delayed placement of titanium dental implants in extraction sockets. METHODS AND MATERIALS The study included 49 patients (28 women, 21 men) in need of implant treatment in the anterior teeth region of either the maxilla or mandible. Twenty-three subjects received 37 immediate (I...
متن کاملRadiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss Following Immediate and Delayed Implantation
Background and Aim: Intraosseous implants can be placed using three different techniques: immediate, early, and delayed. The aim of this study was to compare the changes in the marginal bone level around implants after immediate and delayed im-plant placement. Materials and Methods: In the present prospective cohort study, 26 implants were placed in 26 patients divided into two groups. In grou...
متن کاملA comparative study of alveolar bone changes after immediate implant placement with and without bone graft material in the buccal gap around the immediate implant: A review article
This article has no abstract.
متن کاملBone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: a prospective clinical study.
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare bone healing and crestal bone changes following immediate (Im) versus delayed (De) placement of titanium dental implants with acid-etched surfaces (Osseotite) in extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-six patients were randomly allocated to the Im or De group (n = 23 per group) and received 1 implant at the incisor, canine, or premolar reg...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
سال: 2009
ISSN: 1526-3711
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-10-4-35